The Gamesters of Triskelion
The Gamesters of Triskelion (Memory Alpha; SD Video) is another episode where the crew gets kidnapped and must escape their cage.
It all starts with the familiar BOING of alien transporters in action.
Then Kirk, Chekov, and Uhura are surrounded by four warriors.
Naturally, Kirk and Chekov take one guy each, leaving Uhura to take the two pike-weilding women.
Once subdued, the crew learns their fate: they are to stay here and fight for the amusement of the Providers, who will bet quatloos on the outcomes.
Yes, quatloos!
Kirk does his normal people-want-to-be-free schtick, kisses a girl, and ends up in a fight against three warriors with the fate of the whole crew hanging in the balance.
Begin Spoilers
Kirk wins.
End Spoilers
There are a few things interesting about this episode. The relationship between Kirk and Shahna is the primary one. Kirk, pulling his freedom-is-great move, tries to convince her to help foment rebellion, or at least give him enough information that he can do so. She just doesn’t understand. She knows the fighting culture and nothing else; in a very real way, she’s like a child who has no understanding of the world outside the screwed up game she lives in. So what does Kirk do? He convinces her that she should love him.
That’s pretty close to abuse, I think. Here’s an innocent with no understanding of the consequences of her actions (because she has no agency; they aren’t really her actions), and no understanding that actions have consequences. And Kirk plays with her trust.
Can we talk about slavery?
The other interesting bit is the very obvious parallel with slavery here, and the complete lack of engagement this episode has with the topic. In a lot of episodes the crew is enslaved in some way, but there has yet to be a case where narrative is more than just “let’s get free because we like freedom.” Slavery in Star Trek is a short-term annoyance overcome by clever talk, and the only impact it has is to mess up those other people who’ve been denied the sweet nectar of freedom. The slavers are never dealt with. The corruption of that power structure is assumed but never examined. The long-term after effects are never even thought about. For an issue that we return to so often, how do we avoid talking about it so much?
Grade
C; mostly for the saccharine sweet ending, and the treacly lead up to it